Comments on: Scientific Research vs. Disneyland http://www.aradicalsabbatical.com/2008/02/03/scientific-research-vs-disneyland/ Hearing loss, sabbatical, life, love, friendships and aging Sat, 19 May 2012 21:10:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: butterfly http://www.aradicalsabbatical.com/2008/02/03/scientific-research-vs-disneyland/#comment-89 butterfly Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:44:51 +0000 http://www.aradicalsabbatical.com/2008/02/03/scientific-research-vs-disneyland/#comment-89 Well you did VERY WELL last semester, so I suspect you're just having jitters. But you do make a few good points on articles written in medical journals. One thing that bothers me is this is the stuff newpapers journalists read to write their articles, which are misleading a lot of the time. You know, most the medical news we read in magazines like Newseek and Time is just CRAP because those journalists have no more knowledge than the rest of us. Also tests can be proven faulty YEARS after the results have been published into the mainstream. Someone overlooks a minor detail that no one noticed until another researcher goes back over old tests, and OMG-- everything has to be thrown out!! It's crazy! I am bored but in no more pain now that they took my gallbladder. Well you did VERY WELL last semester, so I suspect you’re just having jitters. But you do make a few good points on articles written in medical journals. One thing that bothers me is this is the stuff newpapers journalists read to write their articles, which are misleading a lot of the time. You know, most the medical news we read in magazines like Newseek and Time is just CRAP because those journalists have no more knowledge than the rest of us. Also tests can be proven faulty YEARS after the results have been published into the mainstream. Someone overlooks a minor detail that no one noticed until another researcher goes back over old tests, and OMG– everything has to be thrown out!! It’s crazy!

I am bored but in no more pain now that they took my gallbladder.

]]>